Pain Index: Where do Arkansas, Purdue, other second-weekend team losses rank?

Pain Index: Where do Arkansas, Purdue, other second-weekend team losses rank?

Pain Index: Where do Arkansas, Purdue, other second-weekend team losses rank?


March Madness is one of the best events in the sports community for what it brings us: upsets, storylines and all the magic of three glorious weekends of win-or-go-home college basketball. When “One Shining Moment” plays at the end of the tournament, even the most stoic fans can be moved to tears.

But on the other side of every loss is a fan base with high expectations and the disappointment that their team left the tournament far too soon. On the receiving end of every buzzer-beater is a team left walking off the court stunned, jerseys covering their faces.

Is it possible to truly measure the level of heartbreak a team and its fans feel after a loss in the NCAA tournament? As a Mets, Jets and 76ers fan, I’m well-versed in sports misery and consider myself equipped with enough firsthand knowledge to compile this ranking of just that, from least to most painful.

This year, we’re breaking them down even further, into tiers:

  • Just happy to be here: Self-explanatory.

  • Such a tease: This tier is for the high seeds that made us do a double take at the scoreboard a few times, before eventually landing at the expected conclusion in blowout fashion.

  • Here’s your participation trophy: These teams were expected to have a reasonable chance to advance, but never really were a threat.

  • Silver linings playbook: The loss wasn’t ideal, but there’s something positive to take from the overall tournament performance.

  • So close, yet so far: They were in it for a majority of the game, but the final score didn’t show it.

  • We’re not mad, just disappointed: For the flat-out underperformers.

  • Emotional roller coaster: They had us at the edge of our seat and biting our nails.

  • If you had one shot or one opportunity: Things came down to the final play.

  • … What just happened?! Reserved for the most painful finishes.

We’re basing these rankings on pre-tournament expectations, peak win probability (according to ESPN Analytics) and other notable storylines or circumstances. We’re also going to update this after each weekend, as teams are eliminated from the dance.

Let’s dive in.

Last updated: April 1, 2025

Tiers:
Just happy to be here | Such a tease | Here’s your participation trophy |
Silver linings playbook | So close, yet so far | We’re not mad, just disappointed |
Emotional roller coaster | If you had one shot or one opportunity | What just happened?!

Just happy to be here

64. Mount St. Mary’s Mountaineers (16-seed, East)
How they lost:
93-49 to 1-seed Duke in the first round
Peak win probability: 0.7% at tip-off

The Mountaineers were never in the game. But they were never expected to be in it. Winning a First Four game brings money to the school and the conference (which is why 16 seeds play in that round instead of only the last at-large teams in the field), so anything beyond that is simply playing with house money.


63. SIU Edwardsville Cougars (16-seed, Midwest)
How they lost:
78-40 to 1-seed Houston in the first round
Peak win probability: 1.2% with 18:13 left in first half, leading 4-2

No shame in losing in the battle of the Cougars. SIU Edwardsville was making its first-ever NCAA tournament appearance and had a lead against a 1-seed. (For what it’s worth, Gonzaga never led against Houston in the next round.) What eventually transpired matters much less than the exposure the school and players got on the sport’s biggest stage.


62. Norfolk State Spartans (16-seed, South)
How they lost:
95-69 to 1-seed Florida in the first round
Peak win probability: 3% at tip-off

The Spartans are known for their 15-2 upset over Missouri in the 2012 tournament, but they’ve become the class of the MEAC in recent seasons, having won the conference’s auto-bid in three of the past five years. This 26-point loss was actually Norfolk State’s closest loss in that span, so things are looking up.


61. Alabama State Hornets (16-seed, South)
How they lost:
83-63 to 1-seed Auburn in the first round
Peak win probability: 6% with 1:29 left in first half, trailing by 1

The Hornets pulled off a stunning last-second win in the First Four, and while the outcome of their meeting with Auburn was likely never in doubt, they still made a game of it for 20 minutes. They were a 32.5-point underdog and hung around with the tournament’s top overall seed. Rest easy, SWAC champs. This is about as good as it gets for a 16-seed.


60. Lipscomb Bisons (14-seed, South)
How they lost:
82-55 to 3-seed Iowa State in the first round
Peak win probability: 14% with 11:18 left in first half, leading by 1

As a 14-seed, all you can ask for is a competitive start — which isn’t even something all the 9-seeds did. The Bisons delivered for their fans in that regard. The 13-point underdogs led Iowa State 16-15 after nine minutes of play. That they then got outscored 41-14 is something we’ll choose not to remember.


59. Bryant Bulldogs (15-seed, South)
How they lost:
87-62 to 2-seed Michigan State in the first round
Peak win probability: 21% with 4:47 left in first half, leading by 3

A 21% win probability is better than most 15-seeds ever see (more on this later), so it was certainly a respectable showing for the Bulldogs. But there’s nothing like a meeting with Tom Izzo in March to remind you that life comes at you fast: The Spartans ended the game on a 33-16 run.

Such a tease

58. Wofford Terriers (15-seed, Midwest)
How they lost:
77-62 to 2-seed Tennessee in the first round
Peak win probability: 6% with 13:33 left in second half, trailing by 8

Wofford was the 6-seed in the SoCon tournament and pulled off three upsets just to reach the Big Dance. Being within shouting distance of the Vols after the break is an accomplishment in itself; a few more shots here or there and this might’ve been an actual sweat.


57. Montana Grizzlies (14-seed, East)
How they lost:
85-66 to 3-seed Wisconsin in the first round
Peak win probability: 12% with 15:14 left in second half, trailing by 4

Montana’s game against Wisconsin played out as most 3-14 and 4-13 games do, with the underdog keeping pace but not truly threatening an upset. Grizzlies fans may have forgotten what losing felt like for a bit though, as Montana had lost just one game since Jan. 19 — in overtime — entering the first round.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *